Municipal Electric Aggregation (MEA) Council Directive

For reference, the City's MEA program has yielded a long-term average rate that is aprx. 10% less than the fluctuating market rate over the life of the program.

At different times we have been able to maximize REC purchasing up to 100% and cover City administrative fees for operating the program while maintaining a supply cost savings but the recent changes in the energy market volatility have made balancing all of this much more difficult.

Financial Threshold *

Check all options you would support administrative execution of an MEA agreement to enroll our citizens into an MEA program.

* required

Supply cost + consultant fee + optional RECs or City Fee is at least 5% less than current price to compare

Supply cost + consultant fee + optional RECs or City Fee is less than or equal to current price to compare

Supply cost + consultant fee + optional RECs or City Fee is higher than current price to compare but within 5%.

Supply cost + consultant fee + optional RECs or City Fee is higher than current price to compare

Please rank these statements for optional inclusion of RECs or a City fee with the City's MEA Program? *

(1 is your top choice, 6 is your last choice)

* required

I am not interested in purchasing RECs or recouping the City administrative fee if it exceeds the current price to compare.

I would prefer maximizing RECs regardless of financial impacts.

I would prefer maximizing RECs over recouping City administrative costs but only at a cost up to the current price to compare.

I would prefer maximizing recouping the City administrative costs regardless of financial impacts.

I would prefer maximizing recouping City administrative costs over purchasing additional RECs but only at a cost up to the current price to compare.

I would prefer balancing additional RECs purchase and recouping City administrative costs but only at a cost up to the current price to compare.